Sunday
Seven men track a circular course on the Dorset/Somerset border. Seven men of a certain age - somewhere between fifty and eighty. We start from a perfectly preserved, perfectly loved chapel dedicated to St Rocco - patron saint of dogs and those who love them, batchelors, surgeons, pilgrims, tile makers, falsely accused people, invalids, diseased cattle and Istanbul. You must admit a wonderful range of beings to look after. Will he look after us as we set off to face wild dogs, angry farmers who hate the footpaths that cross their land and presumably hate those who use them. How will we run from those who would sink their teeth into us: teeth of dog, teeth of horse, teeth of barbed wire? Seven men who in their different ways are drawn to meet out of some consciousness of being men, not only of a certain age, but out of something troubling about being men.
Perhaps men losing ground, being outmanoeuvred by age, herded, caged by the events of their lives, a lack of missionary purpose. What do you believe in? Not very much - is that the answer? But hang on we could become our own purpose. It's very simple. We are not heroes, not saints, nor particularly sinful sinners: there is an ordinariness that is a burden. Perhaps it's the burden of failure, of a failure to understand what it was (precisely) that we were supposed to do. At least we can help each over the barbed wire, give each other courage as the horses gather round unsure what they might want to do us - bite us, kick us? Who knows?
Monday – Thursday
Packing and unpacking modernism and the problem of texts, of spinning words into shapes. How to provoke, how to attract attention, how to write the words that are available, that are given to us out of feeling or idea. How to write a non-narrative text with somewhat startling rhythms, surprising content. A text that engages with others, the Other, you or You. A text that may get beyond the response of 'I don't know what you are talking about'. No, I don't know why I have to do this but what can I do, what defence can I plead - I only have the words that are there.
Then a bit later I'm reading through the day's Guardian (1.10.12) and my eyes light upon John Harris's column in which he discusses a new book due to be published in a couple of weeks. Written by Helen Rosin and given the alarming title: The End of Men: And the Rise of Women. Cardboard men who crumple into defeatism and plastic women who are adaptable and (increasingly) well educated. Harris writes: 'The general impression of millions of men as essentially confused, hidebound creatures, in search of certainties that the modern world has left behind, adds up'. Maybe, maybe not.
I think I have some sort of notion of what Helen Rosin might be setting out to describe and as she dedicates the book to her nine year old son I want to believe that she is writing (at least in part) out of love. But I also have the sense that it is one of those somewhat weird phenomena that comes under the heading of 'now you see it, now you don't'. What have we men done over history after receiving the drubbing of our lives? Yes, sometimes we disappear in alcoholic stupor - by the way I saw a great little play by the name of Botallack O'clock at the Bike Shed Theatre last night - abstract artist Roger Hilton drinking himself into psychotic episodes that in the play are both funny and touchingly painful. Botallack is near St Ives where he lived and painted though confined to bed towards the end of his life (he died in 1975) partly due to alcoholism which is the period of his life that the play focuses on. Was he defeated? Was alcohol a way of not feeling the defeat? This artist who had been a commando in the war and taken prisoner after the Dieppe raid. Questions. Questions. But defeat is also a time for reflection, thinking - how do I do this thing? How do I and we walk on?
I'm bound to be reminded of where we were fifteen years ago with those three words - walking and talking and writing. It's probable that we might also demand of ourselves to say something about where we've got to. Or is that the wrong question?
Let's check this out. Let's check the arithmetic of memory. I was getting older but there was still (I estimated) plenty of time left, barring accidents and those well known Acts of God or plain and simple murder, come to that. The brief time of innocence between forgetting about nuclear weapons and the advent of global warming had just given us the window of opportunity to launch an attack on the unsuspecting world; heads in the clouds, feet barely touching the the wild flowers in the meadows.
Fast forward to some time that might or might not be the present, limping along in a desultory fashion; a result of varieties of conflict and trauma, cynical but still raising the standard of hope. Crawling out of bed, aware that we are not going to do anything very much about anything until it becomes a major catastrophe, such as the iconic asteroid that threatens to bring life on Earth to an abrupt end. Come on, get real – it would not be politically expedient. Instead we have been given a gift: Buffoon Boris. We will elect him to oversee our final apotheosis. The process might well be dialectical: Buffoon Boris's apotheosis but BUT our nemesis. Even if we didn't vote for the Billy Bunter raiding the tuck shop lookalike. Was our collective act one of hubris? Of course I'm getting mixed up in my tenses; suggesting an act in the past when some might feel it belongs in the future. But the confusion of tenses is appropriate because the damage has already been done. It happened when I was asleep.
Dreaming, in fact, of something very different; the sweep of brushstroke that has picked up the energy of the centre, pulling it towards the periphery but then surprisingly executing the most exquisite curve and leading us back to the centre. Or at least that is apparently what is happening. Is that Greedy Guts hanging helplessly from the centre?
The question remains: how do we find our way our of the Hayek maze of wondrous hallucinations? Can we sidestep the dazed bankers, the shell shocked monkeys from News Corp facing criminal charges?
Or another question: how to support and help democracy to evolve? Rather than, in our sense of powerlessness we opt out of democratic struggle even at the basic level of voting. Was it somebody writing in the Daily Telegraph who accused Danny Boyle of sneaking a Marxist analysis into the Opening Ceremony of the London Olympics?
We all have to fight our way into the future. Even if the advantages and disadvantages handed out are so weighted in certain socially conditioned ways. But at the same time we have to work out what happened yesterday in the face of rampant amnesia and varieties of dementia. We, obviously cannot see the myths that currently construct our thinking, not until they are broken and burning on the bonfire of the yesterday's vanities.
Missy Sniper is a version of the Republican/Tea Party/NRA fantasy: it can all be sorted out at the end of a gun. Just make sure YOU are the one with the finger on the trigger. Don't let those other buggers get their fingers in on the act. WE CAN BE TRUSTED (oh yeah!) THEY CAN'T. Let's hear it for Pussy Riot. Dancing in the cathedral and offering a prayer for the demise of Vlad Putin. Well why not? What's the problem?
On board the Dreamboat there were puzzles to be examined. Such as, who is Massimo? Such as, why would anybody think that I might be his friend? And if I was what would it mean? And more importantly, would it be dangerous?
Not that my potential interrogator hung around long enough for me to reply.
Out beyond the harbour walls the Dreamboat encountered a lazy swell; the combination of that gentle lurching and the ever-present smell of fish stirred my intestines into high alert, a state of readiness to evacuate should conditions deteriorate.
More questions flooded my mind, perhaps in an effort to distract attention away from the volatility of current peristaltic activity. Questions such as:
Did Tony Blair wet himself when shown the instruments of torture? Or, even, did any of those convictions he was so proud to display, his façade of self-belief, wobble?
Such as:
What am I supposed to remember?
Such as:
Did the image of the assassin as woman turn you on?
Such as:
What sort of shoes was she wearing?
Such as:
What would it be like living in a de-growth economy?
Such as:
Was the captain of the Dreamboat called Pring? And was he indeed a poet?
Such as:
What are the rules of this vessel?
At the worst of times I’m an anti-poet atheist; at the best of times I don’t give a monkey’s; it is so irrelevant that my mind remains unblemished by such filth. And more importantly I’ve got to get out of this place – the lyrics of a song swirled briefly – if it’s the last thing I ever do. Did the words refer to the factory the singer, or at least the song’s writer, worked in, still living, squashed, in his parents terraced house; dreaming of a future with his girl friend? Poetry, of course, is simply smashed up prose. What some people do instead of getting to grips with the real world.
To be honest I have no idea how many ‘floors’ I have already descended. Didn’t she say two floors down?
I was supposed to be finding the Trumpet Trawler courtesy of Pring the Poet. The thought of bashing my head against the wall suddenly appeared to be the height of sanity. It might help. But look, is this a hopeful sign? The landing I was descending towards was a blaze with lights and not only that but I could now see vast double doors; ancient polished oak with lustrous brass fittings. Surely this was worth a blast of trumpets! It was only later that I, with delayed panic, wondered what I would have done if the doors had been locked, but instead I yanked eagerly at the left hand door and it swung open with delicious ease and I was confronted with a dazzlingly bright morning. Half blinded I staggered down the few steps, ears assailed by the scream of gulls. Smells of the ocean, of fish, of diesel, of people bewildered me. All my senses were working overtime. I had to eat what saw. I had to taste it, touch it. Milling crowds pushed me this way and that, but always closer to the hive of activity on the wharves. But this wasn’t the non-world of luxury yachts this was work, real work. The life dragged from the oceans glittered in variegated mounds. The knives of those gutting and cleaning flashed in the sun with impossible speed.
I felt the hand slipping into the inside pocket of my jacket but by this time my hands were trapped at my sides by the press of the crowd. It was too late to fight. And then I was falling on to the deck of the Dreamboat. I was grateful that nobody bothered me as I lay in semi-conscious dreaming only in some tiny part of my mind aware that the Dreamboat was edging its way through the throng of boats towards the open sea.
But why was it necessary to have all evidence of my past and only life removed?
Move up there, a male voice, harsh, brittle. I tried to move but it didn’t seem at all easy.
Then he leaned in close, are you a friend of Massimo’s?
I hesitated, she hesitated or at least she failed to withdraw. Was it politeness that drove me out, looking for stairs, a lift, looking for a way down. Two floors down. I had left without breakfast and was beginning to feel that tremble and light-headedness of low blood sugar. And there was an accompanying shock of a thought: what if this was the wrong building? What if I in the haste of being a few minutes late had inadvertently entered the wrong building? Why hadn’t I realised before? What had made me so sure that this was the place? But even worse was the nature of this building I was inside. I had fallen into a challenge that I had no way of understanding. All agency was being removed from me. Kafka’s tales were metaphors. Ways of telling a story. How real were they? What is the nature of our emotional life? What bit had Kafka made up? What bit am I making up? Here I was trapped inside a radically changed set of rules.
In the relentless gloom I found some stairs going down but saw no sign of the stairs that I had descended ten minutes before.
The fish wharf (or was it Fish Wharf?) she had said. Though we are a hundred miles from the sea. With unusual briskness, which I suppose was a version of impatience to get this whole thing over and done with; done and dusted and returned to something that promised familiarity, I skipped down the stairs. Yes, I would solve this like I had solved all the other problems that had ever confronted me. Reaching a landing I noticed a figure, an elderly woman, wearing a sun hat and a blue silk scarf, a pale cream linen jacket.
You’d like some coffee, I expect, and a sandwich if you’re hungry and I’m sure that you are hungry, aren’t you.
She stood next to a small circular table on which was a silver coffee pot, a cup and saucer, a silver jug that must contain the hot milk, I could see the thin curl of steam rising from it; and a large plate of sandwiches. Smoked salmon, she informed me.
You need to keep your strength up.
I slowed and crossed the landing towards her. I compared her to the memory of my grandmother; my mother’s mother, and the implied line of women leading back into the past. A line of kindness. And I wondered as to how and where the past exists. Does the past descend as into a grave and do we rise into the future?
I asked her about the Kazoo Dreamboat.
Poetry, she responded, must be honest. Poetry is a chance for us to redeem outselves.
I zipped up, waited a few seconds, grabbed at some oxygen, sighed and shrugged, then turned to face my interrogator. Expecting something altogether more solid, more muscular I was surprised to see a girl, well, a young woman, who could have been no more than seventeen, overwhelmed inside an oversized uniform, dark, black or possible navy, her waif like face locked in uncertainty was a striking contradiction to the questioning, challenging voice I had been subdued by.
Are you, by any chance, looking for the Kazoo Dreamboat, her voice had mysteriously become dream like, soft.
Perhaps she had a colleague with her, somewhere in the shadows, a senior colleague who was supervising her on her first day in the job.
Kazoo Dreamboat? I wondered about the strange name but decided to press on with my mission to reach the conference on the ninth floor.
I’m trying to reach the ninth floor.
A sheaf of papers had appeared in her left hand. She carefully examined them.
Apparently you must go down to the fish wharf, three floors down.
Erm, I rather was hoping to . . . I need to . . . erm pee. I never did like the word pee, so prissy, so pathetic, but my vocal apparatus had got strangled in the effort to say piss.
Sorry, was all she said and waited for me to leave.
As a committee member I had been invited to a specially conformed conference to discuss matters of the utmost international importance. Held as it was within the solid imperial splendour of Victorian limestone, the entrances watched over by uniformed staff, ex-military, ex-police or even ex-G4S, my expectations rose to dizzying heights as to not only the outcome of the conference but my own status which I had always thought to be of a rather doubtful nature, skirting as it did both the gutter and the lower ranks of the aristocracy. Now this, I thought optimistically, now this is where I belong, and squared my shoulders as the commissionaire held out his hand so that he might examine any documentation I might have. My first attempt was a failure because he merely shook his head and moved as though he intended to send me marching back out the door that I had so recently entered through. From my voluminous pockets I was able to produce some other papers. I could see he was sorry that he didn’t have any latex gloves to handle such a doubtful offering but he was willing to take a chance and drew them towards his highly trained nostrils. After many dramatic contortions involving all his extensive facial musculature he cleared his throat. I had assumed he would then return my papers but his hands were now empty and he withdrew into an official indifference as to my existence and if I did indeed exist what actions I might take.
There was no reception desk and no receptionist but fortunately I had been informed my text message that the conference would be held on the ninth floor so I cast about for the lifts. As you well know the public transport systems in that distant city do not include much in the way conveniences so it was imperative that I discover the whereabouts of the gentleman’s conveniences fairly hastily. But I now seemed to be alone so seeing some stairs descending off in the shadows to my left I decided on that course of action. Two flights down I had the notion that a Virgil was needed to guide my steps. Did I have to go down in order to eventually end up on the ninth floor? Had I once again made the wrong decision? But, no, there is a door, heavy dark wood, perhaps mahogany, and though there was no sign on the door my spirits were lifted at the prospect of relief of urinary pressure. And what a delight it was to see a long row of gleaming urinals arrayed along the length of one wall, with gleaming copper pipework and glass splash guards to protect my admittedly unpolished shoes. Unzipping, as one must, in such circumstances, I was surprised by a low cough behind me. And then a woman’s voice:
‘Are you Pring, the poet?’ Almost a purr, even a hint of growl.
‘N-n-no,’ I stammered.
‘Are you Peliot the poet?’
‘No,’ no longer a stammer, but in fact a hint of anger that I was being delayed in self-producing the wished for relief.
‘Are you a poet at all?’
‘No, no, no I’m not a poet but I have to get to the ninth floor.’
That might just have been the wrong thing to say.
(To be continued)
Christopher Turner (LRB 5 July 2012) in his review of the Barbican exhibition: Bauhaus: Art as Life, quotes Gropius’s manifesto that called for a unity between art and craft, a unity that would ‘rise one day towards heaven from the hands of a million workers like the crystalline symbol of a new faith’ and to facilitate ‘a community that wanted to create a new man in a new environment.’
Where do any of us stand in relation to this linchpin of an ambition? What sort of work or practice would it take to bring enough light into our beings to make us ‘better’ people? Do we even believe that it is possible? And what is the evidence for change in us?
Visiting an old friend recently, it seemed to me that he was much the same as he was when I met him more than forty years ago. There was the same strong ethical thread informing his behaviour as well as being an opportunistic chancer who was able to charm his way across social, professional and bureaucratic boundaries. And when I, in turn, reflected on any possible changes in me that I could detect, I see the same short sighted, shy individual with a poor instinctive sense of reality, who has to rely on books to aid him in building some useable concepts of reality. Sort of.
Because there is a strand of doubt which hardly believes that locked into our subjective/objective tensions we have never and will never finally describe reality. And this idea or belief is central to this blog and then, of course, there is a but, quite a big but:
But we can be tantalised, seduced, persuaded, entertained, enraged and engaged as we pursue these strange and surprising, not to say outrageous, gods of language.
Not really a circular journey because that presupposes that the person who comes back is the person who set out all those days, months or years before. But we are confined to our spherical prison under the stars and under the sun. Renzo Piano’s Shard points the way out. The straight line must be the stuff of imagination. It informs, lends a narrow beam of light to our lives. Enables us to pretend that we have pushed God off ‘his’ throne and replaced him with . . . what? Science, psychoanalysis, all sorts of possibilities come to mind. And we really can tell stories . . . well, some of us can and some of us are rubbish at it.
The Flags Are Out
The flags are out – no I don’t why either . . .
but we may have to bend ourselves to the collective will.
The deer came out of nowhere; no, that’s not quite true
it obviously came out of somewhere.
It emerged in a rush from the hedge on my right
startled by my appearance before her, two or three metres
from her, she swerved and plunged into the opposite hedge.
A brief encounter with the wild – a second from
a collision that I imagine would have left me
sprawling in the road because she was all force.
A force intent on evasion and survival
making a life on the margins of the human dominated landscape.
Bright eyed maenad alive with perfection; one being intensity
tearing me limb from limb; flesh organs bones into
the mincer. The fat red-faced cook turning the handle
with gusto, eyes libidinously merry,
dreaming of such a dish to set before the king;
Spices and fruit bursting with juices
bursting on the jaded palates of a thousand diners.
Come overwhelm me, my darling –
this is something special: to be remade
to enter the hunt, to outwit time
to twist and shout exulting the joy, to fall
to touch the cathartic as an equal; to die as she dies
because each day I must enter her once more
in order to find what I must be.
(Alan Kirby 2012)
Dialogic serial feuilleton by Alan Kirby (ak) and Dr Max Mackay-James (mmj)
Recent Comments